A Landlord’s Claims for Compensation at the End of a Residential Tenancy: A Repost from ABLAWG

A recent blog post from ABblawg.ca provides helpful comments on the written decision of the Alberta Provincial Court in the residential tenancy matter of Barry v Navratil, 2019 ABPC 229 (CanLII). The decision and its commentary are particularly welcome given the dearth of written decisions in this area.

In his judgment, Judge LeGrandeur addresses a number of issues landlords and tenants often argue about when a tenant moves out: repairing versus replacing, betterment, wear and tear, and cleaning. He also affirms the rule that the statutory obligations in the Residential Tenancies Act, SA 2004, c R-17.1 are the only ones applicable; a landlord cannot demand from a tenant any additional or more onerous obligations. Finally, Judge LeGrandeur also discusses the burden of proof, standard of proof, and the need for evidence, key elements both tenants and landlords should be aware of when appearing in front of the Residential Tenancy Dispute Resolution Service or the Provincial Court.

You can read the blog post at: https://ablawg.ca/2019/11/08/wear-and-tear-cleanliness-repair-replacement-and-betterment-a-landlords-claims-for-compensation-at-the-end-of-a-residential-tenancy/

This entry was posted in Civil Litigation, Housing Law, Poverty law, Public Policy and tagged , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s